Block 938,410

Wasted block space on pixelated trash inscriptions? That's not innovation, it's a deliberate attack on Bitcoin's scarcity.

View on mempool.space1cd2c029…89e51dad:3

Spam inscriptions mocking Bitcoin's relay rules, turning full nodes into reluctant IPFS proxies.

View on mempool.space1de52397…76052976:3

Bitcoin's social layer rejects spam: HODLers vs inscription parasites, and we're winning the culture war.

View on mempool.space1e2f216e…40bd5604:3

Pure culture war: maximalists defending monetary purity vs. shitcoiners shoving ordinal degeneracy down our throats.

View on mempool.space1e49ebf6…f4ba7521:3

UTXO hell from recursive inscriptions: nodes choking, sync times doubling, all for some pixelated BS that nobody asked for ever.

View on mempool.space1ecf1c8c…1f7189c2:3

WTF miners, prioritizing spam over tx relay? Your greed is fracturing the network's relay backbone.

View on mempool.space1f6b7d49…ea587b7d:2

Fee market? More like fee farce, as spam pumps rates sky-high for zero value-add inscriptions.

View on mempool.space1f83a3bb…3a7b9fee:3

Attack vector confirmed: ordinals weaponize Bitcoin blocks against honest nodes and users alike.

View on mempool.space1f8cbfac…691a5580:3

Ordinals aren't innovation; they're a cultural cancer bloating chain with OP_RETURN abuse and fake "art.

View on mempool.space1f914cf5…233348c1:3

This inscription spam is a direct attack on Bitcoin's relay policy, forcing nodes to choke on worthless JPEGs and runes filth.

View on mempool.space1f9cc15b…76e0446f:3